A Study on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Science Education of Gifted Individuals
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15715393Keywords:
Gifted Students, Science Education, Artificial intelligence, Document ReviewAbstract
Through the education of gifted individuals, cultural and intellectual progress is actively provided, and these individuals are supported to realize innovative transformations in their countries. It is essential to design learning environments where gifted individuals can realize their potential at the highest level and benefit from the technological opportunities of the age. In the context of the digital transformation process in the field of education, the role of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in education is becoming increasingly important; AI-supported applications attract attention in many areas, such as individualizing and differentiating the learning process, supporting students' strengths, and diversifying ways of accessing information. This study aims to systematically examine academic studies conducted in the last decade (2014–2024) on artificial intelligence (AI)-based applications in the science education of gifted individuals. This research used the literature review method, sample characteristics, publication location (international/national), research designs, studied topics, AI tools, and data analysis methods as the basic review criteria. Within the scope of the study, national and international databases (ERIC, Scopus, Web of Science, ULAKBİM, etc.) were searched with keywords such as “gifted students”, “science education”, “artificial intelligence”, “AI in gifted education”; studies that met the inclusion criteria were examined in detail. At the end of the study, trends, focused themes, and methodological features regarding the use of artificial intelligence in science education of gifted individuals will be systematically presented in line with the obtained data. This review aims to guide researchers and practitioners who want to plan the use of artificial intelligence in science education for gifted individuals in the future more effectively and in a more targeted manner by revealing the general trends and gaps in the studies conducted in the field.
References
Aydın, M., & Yurdugül, H. (2024). Developing a curriculum framework of artificial intelligence teaching for gifted students. Kastamonu Education Journal, 32(1), 14-37. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi
Balca, S., Bozkuş, B., Yapağcı, E., Alparslan, E., & Durak, M. A. (2023). BİLSEM'lerin kuruluşu ve Necate Baykoç'un hayatı (The establishment of BILSEM centers and the life of Necate Baykoç). İbrahim Mert Öztürk, HIST 200-2 (2022-2023 Fall); 7.
Bellanca, J., & Brandt, R. (2010). 21st century skills: Rethinking how students learn. (B. R. Bellanca J., Ed.) Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
Camcı-Erdoğan, S. (2014). Üstün zekalı ve yetenekli öğrenciler için fen bilimleri eğitiminde farklılaştırmanın gerekliliği. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 2(2), 1-10.
Chang, J., Park, J., & Park, J. (2023). Using an artificial intelligence chatbot in scientific inquiry: Focusing on a guided-inquiry activity using inquirybot. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 9(1), 44-74. https://doi.org/10.1163/23641177-bja10062
Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264-75278. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510
Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37-46. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104
Costa, E. B., Fonseca, B., Santana, M. A., de Araújo, F. F., & Rego, J. (2017). Evaluating the effectiveness of educational data mining techniques for early prediction of students' academic failure in introductory programming courses. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 247-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.047
Eşki, B., & Tarhan, Ç. (2022). Türkiye'de eğitimde dijital dönüşüm: Cbs tabanlı bir analiz. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 24(özel sayı), 322-336. https://doi.org/10.16953/deusosbil.1189601
Fernández, E., García, T., Arias-Gundín, O., Vázquez, A., & Rodriguez, C. (2017). Identifying gifted children: Congruence among different IQ measures. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(1239), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01239
Garcia, E., Jimenez, M. A., de Santos, P. G., & Armada, M. (2007). The evolution of robotics research. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 14(1), 90-103. https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2007.339608
Hsu, T., Abelson, H., Lao, N., Tseng, Y. & Lin, Y. (2021). Behavioral-pattern exploration and development of an instructional tool for young children to learn AI. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100012
Kaya, N. G., Mertol, H., Turhan, G., Araz, D., & Uçar, H. (2022). Üstün yetenekli öğrencilerin eğitiminde farklılaştırma ve zenginleştirme uygulamalarına ilişkin yapılan lisansüstü tezlerin incelenmesi. Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 41, 102-114.
Kocadağ, T. (2009). İlköğretim 4. sınıf fen ve teknoloji dersinde interaktif eğitim yazılımları kullanımının kaynaştırma öğrencilerinin başarısına etkisi [Yayınlanmamış Yüksel Lisans Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi]. Gazi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
Looi, C., McCalla, G., Bredeweg, B., & Breuker, J. (2005). Artificial Intelligence in Education. IOS.
Luckin, R., Koedinger, K., & Greer, J. (2007). Artificial intelligence in education. IOS.
Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı (MEB). (2004). Türkiye yüzyılı maarif modeli öğretim programları ortak metni. Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı.
National Research Council (NRC). (1996). National science education standards. National Academy Press.
Özkan, U. B. (2023). Doküman inceleme yönteminde geçerlik ve güvenirlik: Eğitim bilimleri araştırmaları bağlamında kuramsal bir inceleme. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 56, 832-848. https://doi.org/10.53444/deubefd.1258867
Renzulli, J. S. (2012). Reexamining the role of gifted education and talent development for the 21st century: A four-part theoretical approach. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56(3), 150-159. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986212444901
Sarıoğlu, S. (2023). Bilimsel süreç becerilerinin yapay zekâ ile yordanması, öğrenciler ve üstün yetenekli öğrencilerdeki etkililiği [Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi]. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi.
Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(1), 3–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1
Tomlinson, C. (2005). Grading and differentiation: Paradox or good practice? Theory into Practice, 44, 262-269.
Wang, S., Wang, F., Zhu, Z., Wang, J., Tran, T., & Du, Z. (2024). Artificial intelligence in education: A systematic literature review. Expert Systems with Applications, 252(Part A), 124167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124167
Watson, C. (2023). An online STEM program for gifted students of color amidst COVID-19. Journal of STEM Outreach, 6(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.15695/jstem/v6i2.08
World Economic Forum. (2020). Schools of the future defining new models of education for the fourth industrial revolution. Cologny/Geneva, Switzerland: Platform for shaping the future of the new economy and society. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Sc adresinden erişilmiştir.
Zaidi, A., Beadle, S., & Hannah, A. (2019). Review of the online learning and artificial intelligence education market: A report for the department of education july 2018. Government Social Resesarch. https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/33536/1/DFR_Online_learning_and_AIEd_market_review.pdf adresinden erişilmiştir.
Zeide, E. (2019). Artificial intelligence in higher education: Applications, promise and perils, and ethical questions. Educause Review, 31-39. https://er.educause.edu/-/media/files/articles/2019/8/er193104.pdf adresinden erişilmiştir.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Heterotopic View

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.