In The Geographıcal Reason Perspectıve Of Lıberalısm Cosmopolıtanısm And The Problem Of The Boundary Of Freedom
Abstract views: 136
/ 
PDF downloads: 122
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10413214Keywords:
Geographical reason, cosmopolitanism, Space, BoundaryAbstract
This study was written to evaluate the discourse and praxis of cosmopolitics, which is the universal imagination of ethics, morality and justice principles, by addressing the concept of "geographical reason" in David Harvey's book "Cosmopolitanism and the Geographies of Freedom" published in 2009. Through this concept, it is tried to reveal how liberal and neoliberal policies benefit power and power holders on a local and global scale by resorting to the numerous tricks of geographical reason. It has been examined how liberalism, with the idea and goal of universalizing human rights by getting rid of local nationalist claims, places the limits it draws on rights and freedoms in a context. According to Harvey, liberalism, in general terms, resorts to two methods in drawing the boundaries of freedoms. The first is to ignore geographical and anthropological differences, the second is to use these differences in line with its own interests, especially to cover its failures. Analyzing how geographical reason serves the interests of those in power in constructing perceptions, Harvey argues that a new geographical reason should be established. This reason should be placed in a theoretical context of geography to unlock the potential of space, place and environment in the pursuit of cosmopolitics and freedom. The method used in this study on Harvey's perspective on geographical reason is document analysis. In line with the aim of the study, the analysis of the information and documents obtained through literature review focused on themes such as "geographical reason", "cosmopolitanism", "limits of rights and freedoms". In conclusion, Harvey has conceptualized in detail the geographical reason to be constructed through geographical theory. However, the details of whose cosmopolitanism this reason will implement and how it will implement it are left vague.
References
Ananga, E. O., & Peaden, C. (2021). Deconstructing Emmanuel Kant and David Harvey's perception of cosmopolitanism. Oklahoma Politics, 31, 65-92.
Appiah, K. (2007). Cosmopolitanism. ethics in a world of strangers. Penguin.
Association of American Geographers (1984). Guidelines for geographic education: elementary and secondary schools. Association of American Geographers.
Beck, U. (2006a). The Cosmopolitan perspective: sociology in the second age of modernity". In S. Vertovec ve R. Cohen (Ed.), Conceiving Cosmopolitanism içinde (61-86). Oxford University Press.
Beck, U. (2006b). Living in the world risk society: A Hobhouse memorial public lecture given on wednesday 15 february 2006 at the london school of economics. Economy and society, 35(3), 329-345.
Beck, U. (2006c). Cosmopolitan vision. Polity Press.
Beitz, C. R. (2005). Cosmopolitanism and global justice. In, G. Brck & D. Moellendorf (Eds.), Current debates in global justice (pp. 11-27). Springer.
Benhabib, S. (2004). The rights of others: aliens, residents and citizens. Cambridge University Press.
Benhabib, S. (2006). Another cosmopolitanism. In R. Post (Ed.), Another cosmopolitanism (pp. 13–80). Oxford University Press.
Bertram, C. (2006). Cosmopolitanism and inequality. Res Publica, 3(12), pp. 327-336.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), pp. 27-40, https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027 .
Buchanan, L. B., & Tschida, C. M. (2015). Exploring the five themes of geography using technology. Ohio Social Studies Review, 52(1), 29-40.
Carney, G. O. (1999). Cowabunga! Surfer rock and the five themes of geography. Popular Music & Society, 23(4), 3-29.
Cooper, R. (2003). The breaking of nations: order and chaos in the twenty-first century. Atlantic Monthly Press.
Derpmann, S. (2009). Solidarity and cosmopolitanism. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 12(3), 303-315.
Derrida, J. (2001). On cosmopolitanism and forgiveness (Thinking in action). Routledge.
Dittmer, J. (2011). Cosmopolitanism and the geographies of freedom. Journal of Cultural Geography, 28(1), 227-228.
Edney, M. (1990). Mapping an empire: the geographical construction of british India, 1765-1843. University of Chicago Press.
Fine, R. (2007). Cosmopolitanism. Routledge.
Green, P. (2012). Cosmopolitanism and the geographies of freedom, David Harvey, New York: Columbia University Press, 2009. Historical Materialism, 20(4), 213-225.
Harvey, D. (2009). Cosmopolitanism and the geographies of freedom. Columbia University Press.
Harvey, D. (2014). Seventeen contradictions and the end of capitalism. Oxford University Press.
Harvey, D. (2015). Kozmopolitlik ve özgürlük Coğrafyaları (Z. C. Başeren, Çev.). İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
Harvey, D. (2017). What do we do with cosmopolitanism? In N. G. Schiller & A. Irving (Eds.), Whose Cosmopolitanism?: critical perspectives, relationalities and discontents (pp. 49-57). Berghan Books.
Huggler, J. (2010). Cosmopolitanism and peace in Kant’s essay on ‘perpetual peace’. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 29, 129-140.
Kant, I. (1917). Perpetual peace: A philosophical essay. G. Allen & Unwin ltd.
Kant, I. (1991). Kant: political writings (H. B. Nibet, Trans.). Cambridge University Press.
Koczanowicz, L. (2010). Cosmopolitanism and its predicaments. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 29(2), 141-149.
McFarlane, C. (2011). Book review forum: David Harvey, cosmopolitanism and the geographies of freedom. Columbia University Press.
Mehta, U. S. (1999). Liberalism and empire: a study in nineteenth-century british thought. University of Chicago Press.
Mignolo, W. (2010). Cosmopolitanism and the de-colonial option. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 29, 111-127.
Montgomery, R. (1991). The five themes of geography in literature. Social Studies Texan, 6(3), 58-60.
Natoli, S. J. (1994). Guidelines for geographic education and the fundamental themes in geography. Journal of Geography, 93(1), 2-6.
Nussbaum, M. (1997a). Cultivating humanity. Harvard University Press.
Nussbaum, M. (1997b). Kant and stoic cosmopolitanism. Journal of Political Philosophy, 5, 1-25.
Orhan, B., & Karabağ, S. (2021). Mülk ve mülkiyet. Turkish Studies - Social, 16(4), 1601-1619. https://dx.doi.org/10.47356/TurkishStudies
Pattison, W. (1964). The four traditions of geography. Journal of Geography, 63, 211-216.
Rao, R. (2010). Disciplining cosmopolitanism. Transnational Legal Theory, 1(3), 393-420.
Schiller, G., & Irving, A. (2017). Whose cosmopolitanism?: critical perspectives, relationalities and discontents. Berghan Books.
Steinberg, P. (2011). Book review forum: David Harvey, cosmopolitanism and the geographies of freedom (pp. 111-116). New York: Columbia University Press.
Strand, T. (2010). Introduction: cosmopolitanism in the making. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 29(2), 103-109.
Şahin, B. (2022). Coğrafya eğitiminin beş teması. S. Karabağ ve S. Şahin (Ed.), Coğrafya eğitiminin temel eksenleri içinde (49-67). Pegem Akademi.
Van Hooft, S., & Vandekerckhove, W. (2010). Questioning cosmopolitanism (Vol. 6). Springer Science & Business Media.
Warf, B. (2010). A Review of “Cosmopolitanism and the geographies of freedom”. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 100(5), 1217-1219.
Warf, B. (2015). Global cities, cosmopolitanism, and geographies of tolerance. Urban Geography, 36(6), 927–946, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2015.1067408
Waterstone, M. (2011). Cosmopolitanism and the geographies of freedom. harvey, david. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Swedish Society for Anthropology and Geography, 93(3), 271–272.
Withers, C. W. J. (2013). The enlightenment and geographies of cosmopolitanism. Scottish Geographical Journal, 129(1), 36-53.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Heterotopic View
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal is licensed under a 